<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:ynews="http://news.yahoo.com/rss/">
    <channel>
        <title>International Journal of Healthcare Simulation - Subject</title>
        <link>https://archive.johs.org.uk</link>
        <description>Default RSS Feed</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright></copyright>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Authoring and othering: examining bias in scenario design]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-ijohs-unsecured-files/unsecured/contents-1636192288138-e933cae7-059b-4fb4-aae4-0f6eebd7a865/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://archive.johs.org.uk/book/isbn/10.54531/WIDJ3751</link>
            <description><![CDATA[
<p class="para" id="N65542">Simulation-based education (SBE) is recognized as an interactive educational methodology for producing new knowledge and developing professional skills. Effective engagement of simulation has the potential to shape and shift ideas, beliefs and attitudes about what it means to be a good healthcare professional. As healthcare simulation educators we have a responsibility to ensure that the scenarios created and enacted by our Simulated Participants are educationally sound and clinically representative.</p>
<p class="para" id="N65545">Case development is more than the sum of creating a patient illness landscape for students to navigate. There is a social and ethical responsibility to sensitively and accurately articulate how a patient’s medical history dovetails with their unique world view, culture, values and beliefs, without essentializing or moralizing. To prevent reproducing stigmatizing stereotypes, and make visible our taken for granted assumptions, we need to embrace health professions as both a social and clinical undertaking, and understand how the echoes of pedagogical experience can profoundly influence students’ professional values and attitudes in clinical practice.</p>
<p class="para" id="N65548">Engaging critical perspectives, this submission will address SBE’s potential impact of reproducing healthcare inequities through poor scenario design and outline considerations for distinguishing and ameliorating essentializing and stigmatizing representations.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2021-09-21T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Current status of simulation-based medical education in India and the way forward]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-ijohs-unsecured-files/unsecured/contents-1636210338322-b0b79eeb-7fbb-4a0d-ada7-4189332d3e28/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://archive.johs.org.uk/book/isbn/10.54531/QSZT9784</link>
            <description><![CDATA[
<p class="para" id="N65542">India is waking up to the importance of simulation-based education (SBE). More and more institutions are setting up centralized simulation training facilities, while others have such facilities at the departmental level. The new National Medical Commission curriculum mandates communication and procedural skills training for undergraduate medical students and it is likely that SBE will soon be mandated for postgraduates as well. In my experience there are several difficulties with a universal adoption of SBE in healthcare in India. This article describes the current situation of SBE in healthcare in India before proposing strategies to enhance uptake and acceptance.</p>
]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2021-09-21T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>